Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The Battle Between E-books and Print



Which do you prefer:  snuggling up in front of the fire with your kindle or with a paperback?  Everyone has met the technology holdouts--those who say "I just don't think I'd like a kindle.  I like to hold the book in my hands and turn the real pages."  Then there are those who swear that e-readers are the best invention since the printing press.

So where do your loyalties lie?  I have to say that, personally, I'm Switzerland in this battle.  I can see both sides.  I've always loved books, and I do like the feel of turning those pages and the satisfaction of seeing my bookmark halfway through the bound bulk.  However, I recently told my husband that he was no longer allowed to purchase physical books.  We have absolutely no room on any of our many bookshelves and neither he nor I  are willing to part with any or our literary treasures.   Enter the beauty of an e-reader.  Space!  Oh, how nice it is to have hundreds of books at your fingertips and not have to build an addition onto your house!

As in every great debate, there are strong opinions on both sides.  As an e-book author, I should probably say, "Yes!  Definitely go with the e-reader!"  But I'm not a hypocrite.  My beloved paperbacks are staying in their home on my shelf. 

So, my advice?  Why does it have to be a battle?  Do both!  Get an e-reader to feed your hunger for so many books that you could never hope to store, then buy the paperback version of your very favorite you want to read again.   For, at the end of the day, can't we all just get along?  (And curl up with a good book, or course.)

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Now Available!

Christian Romantic Suspense
MIRAGE, Book 2:  Tru Exceptions Series
Sequel to BAGGAGE CLAIM, Book 1

The terrorist attack . . . Dawson Tate . . . What if nothing is as it appears to be?  When the unexpected happens, Rachel Saunders must unravel the web of secrets surrounding her boyfriend's work with Homeland Security and their relationship.  While confronted with new facts about Dawson's mysterious ex from Florida and the attention of DHS agent Garrett Matthews, Rachel must find a way to save the man she can no longer trust.  Will anything or anyone survive after the truth is revealed and the mirage fades?

Now Available for $1.99 on Kindle or Nook!


Friday, March 9, 2012

The Elements of a Great Romance


 
What is it that makes the classic romance novels so great?  There are very few books I read multiple times.  Usually once is enough.  Yet I never tire of reading Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice over and over.  What is it that makes a great romance?

Characters
Great romances have unique, relatable, well-developed characters.   Take Pride and Prejudice's Elizabeth Bennett, for instance.  She is far from perfect.  She is delightfully quirky and doesn't fit the mold for the society portrayed in the novel.  She is smart, witty, impertinent, opinionated, and very, very and likable and easy to relate to.  Mr. Darcy as well is a very unique, complex character.  What woman reading Pride and Prejudice doesn't put herself in Elizabeth Bennett's shoes and wish for her own modern day Mr. Darcy?

Conflict
There is no plot without conflict.  But a romance has either the sole or additional conflict of the relationship between the man and woman.  In some books, the romance is the entire plot, while in others the romance works in tandem with additional action and storyline.  In short, there has to be some problem that is keeping the couple apart.  This problem can be internal struggles the characters face, as in Pride and Prejudice or external problems as in Romeo and Juliet.  Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy aren't together because of their own pride and prejudices, whereas Romeo and Juliet are kept apart by their feuding families.  Either way, a great romance requires a great conflict, making the reader wonder, will they get together or not?

Chemistry
A great romance requires chemistry between the characters.  There must be an attraction, some magic woven between two people.   The reader's heart needs to pound in time with the main character's.  Whether it be love at first sight or the classic 'I love you, I hate you,' interplay between Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy,  there has to be fireworks that the reader can feel and relate to.  Added to this is the delayed satisfaction that, because of the conflict in the story, this chemistry is forbidden in some way.   And that is how a reader is hooked.

Climax
By 'climax,' I refer to the major turning point of the story.  Everything has been building to this moment when the characters either get together or not.  A strong, definite climax is what helps a romance be memorable.  A skilled author will draw the reader in so he or she feels what the character feels at that moment, experiencing the drama and romance of feelings being declared and the tide turning.  The final climactic scene in Pride and Prejudice where Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy declare their feelings is horribly romantic with him saying, "If your feelings are still what they were last April, tell me so at once.  My affections and wishes are unchanged, but one word from you will silence me on this subject for ever."  However, I have to admit, I actually prefer the sheer romance and drama of the same scene beautifully portrayed in the 2005 movie.  For after everything, what woman's heart doesn't melt at Mr. Darcy's words as he finally tells Elizabeth, "You have bewitched me body and soul, and I love, and love, and love you.  And never wish to be parted from you from this day on."

Conclusion
As much as I hate to admit it, the conclusion, the ending, of a great romance doesn't have to be happy.  But it does have to be memorable.  Part of the great allure of Romeo and Juliet is that it's such a shocking, tragic end to the star-crossed lovers.  Would the romance be as memorable if Romeo and Juliet had experienced their happily ever after?  No, probably not.  But each story is individual.  Would the romance be as memorable if Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy hadn't experienced their happily ever after.  Absolutely not.  Simply put, the conclusion has to match the story, and it has to be good.  I hate it when a good romance just fizzles at the end with a sappy line, as if the author doesn't know how to end it.  It just kind of ruins the entire story for me.  I'm a firm believer that the ending, even the last sentence of the book has to echo and tie off the entire story.  It's like the last flavor in the mouth of the reader.  Make it count.

So, let us spin the web of romance for our readers.  Let us draw them in to an alternate reality where the characters are real.  Let us make them feel and imagine.  My romances will probably never rank up with the classics; all I can hope for is to do a little of my own bewitching.